Which to use
“we're” is a contraction and “were” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #394
- “we're” frequency rank
- #52
- “were” frequency rank
- 446
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | we're | were |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Contraction of we + are. | second-person singular simple past indicative of be |
Where the eye mixes we're and were
Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 4 letters in sequence.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: we're is /wɪə/ while were is /wə(ɹ)/. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (contraction vs verb), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 446, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
we're is recorded at frequency rank #394, classified as acontraction, pronounced /wɪə/. were is at rank #52, tagged as averb, pronounced /wə(ɹ)/.
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 446, this pair ranks #529,400 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.
Orthographic DNA of we're vs were
Shared letters: erw. Private to "we're": -. Private to "were": -.
"we're" · 4 letters · shape CVCV · "were" · 4 letters · shape CVCV
Known mistypes of this pair
- were ← ewre · weer · werre · wree · wwere