Which to use
“took” is a verb and “tusk” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #292
- “took” frequency rank
- #31,017
- “tusk” frequency rank
- 31309
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | took | tusk |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | simple past of take | One of a pair of elongated pointed teeth that extend outside the mouth of an animal such as walrus, elephant or wild boar, and which continue to grow throughout the animal's life. |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set took and tusk apart are highlighted. They share 2 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
took and tusk form a confusable pair in the English index, two distinct headwords that are easily confused because they look alike, sound alike, or both. They share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions - close enough that the eye skips over the difference, far enough that meaning fully diverges. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 31309, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
took is recorded at frequency rank #292, classified as averb, pronounced /tʊk/. tusk is at rank #31,017, tagged as anoun, pronounced /ˈtʌsk/.
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 31309, this pair ranks #347,203 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "took" and "tusk" be used interchangeably?
Remembering took vs tusk
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Check the role first: if you need a verb, it's “took”; for a noun, it's “tusk”.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “took” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable