Which to use
“Reuters” is a name and “routes” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #8,719
- “Reuters” frequency rank
- #5,260
- “routes” frequency rank
- 13979
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Reuters | routes |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | plural of Reuter | plural of route |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set Reuters and routes apart are highlighted. They share 5 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
Reuters and routes form a confusable pair in the English index, two distinct headwords that are easily confused because they look alike, sound alike, or both. They differ by 1 letter(s) in length - close enough that the eye skips over the difference, far enough that meaning fully diverges. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 13979, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
Reuters is recorded at frequency rank #8,719, classified as aname, pronounced /ˈɹɔɪtɚs/. routes is at rank #5,260, tagged as anoun, pronounced /ɹuːts/.
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 13979, this pair ranks #472,764 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "Reuters" and "routes" be used interchangeably?
Remembering Reuters vs routes
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Check the role first: if you need a name, it's “Reuters”; for a noun, it's “routes”.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “Reuters” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable