recordsvsretardsWhat's the difference?

Which to use

“records” and “retards” are a confusable English pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#1,352
“records” frequency rank
#33,396
“retards” frequency rank
34748
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature records retards
Definition plural of record plural of retard

Where the spellings diverge

Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set records and retards apart are highlighted. They share 5 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.

7 ch
records
7 ch
retards

Spelling & Dictionary Insight

A purely visual mix-up. records (/ˈɹɛkɚdz/) and retards (/ɹɪˈtɑː(ɹ)dz/) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 34748, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

records is recorded at frequency rank #1,352, classified as anoun, pronounced /ˈɹɛkɚdz/. retards is at rank #33,396, tagged as anoun, pronounced /ɹɪˈtɑː(ɹ)dz/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 34748, this pair ranks #318,078 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of records vs retards

Shared letters: ders. Private to "records": co. Private to "retards": at.

"records" · 7 letters · shape CVCVCCC  ·  "retards" · 7 letters · shape CVCVCCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • recordsercords · rceords · reccords · recodrs · recordds · recordss · recorrds · recorsd
  • retardsertards · reatrds · retadrs · retardds · retardss · retarrds · retarsd · retrads

Frequency comparison

records#1,352
retards#33,396

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "records" and "retards" be used interchangeably?
No. They are said differently (/ˈɹɛkɚdz/ versus /ɹɪˈtɑː(ɹ)dz/) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Which is more common, "records" or "retards"?
"records" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #1,352 in our English list, against #33,396 for "retards". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

Remembering records vs retards

The fastest way to pick the right one every time.

  • Read both glosses above and match the meaning you intend, only context separates this pair.
  • See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “records” entry
  • Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list