verleihenvsverletzenWhich spelling fits?

Which to use

“verleihen” and “verletzen” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#7,415
“verleihen” frequency rank
#6,739
“verletzen” frequency rank
14154
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature verleihen verletzen
Definition etwas zeitweise jemandem überlassen jemanden physisch (auch lebensgefährlich oder tödlich) verwunden

Where the eye mixes verleihen and verletzen

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 7 letters in sequence.

9 ch
verleihen
9 ch
verletzen

Why the eye confuses verleihen with verletzen

A purely visual mix-up. verleihen ([fɛɐ̯ˈlaɪ̯ən]) and verletzen ([fɛɐ̯ˈlɛt͡sn̩]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 14154, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

verleihen is recorded at frequency rank #7,415, classified as averb, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈlaɪ̯ən]. verletzen is at rank #6,739, tagged as averb, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈlɛt͡sn̩].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 14154, this pair ranks #1,953,187 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of verleihen vs verletzen

Shared letters: elnrv. Private to "verleihen": hi. Private to "verletzen": tz.

"verleihen" · 9 letters · shape CVCCVVCVC  ·  "verletzen" · 9 letters · shape CVCCVCCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • verleihenevrleihen · velreihen · verelihen · verlehien · verleiehn · verleihenn · verleihhen · verleihne
  • verletzenevrletzen · velretzen · vereltzen · verletezn · verlettzen · verletzenn · verletzne · verletzzen

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "verleihen" for "verletzen" ever safe?
No. They are said differently ([fɛɐ̯ˈlaɪ̯ən] versus [fɛɐ̯ˈlɛt͡sn̩]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Frequency check: "verleihen" vs "verletzen" - which ranks higher?
"verletzen" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #6,739 in our German list, against #7,415 for "verleihen". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

After this comparison

Visual near-miss handled. Browse the word pages or a neighbour when the next look-alike shows up.

  • Full dictionary entry for "verleihen" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "verletzen" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,953,187 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "verleihen" and "verletzen" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "verletzen vs verletzend". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,953,187 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list