Which to use
“verlegten” is an adjective and “verletzen” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #34,970
- “verlegten” frequency rank
- #6,739
- “verletzen” frequency rank
- 41709
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | verlegten | verletzen |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Genitiv Singular Maskulinum der starken Flexion des Positivs des Adjektivs verlegt | jemanden physisch (auch lebensgefährlich oder tödlich) verwunden |
Where the eye mixes verlegten and verletzen
Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 8 letters in sequence. verlegten and verletzen follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (CVCCVCCVC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.
Why the eye confuses verlegten with verletzen
These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: verlegten is [fɛɐ̯ˈleːktn̩] while verletzen is [fɛɐ̯ˈlɛt͡sn̩]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions, and the parts of speech differ too (adjective vs verb), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 41709, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
verlegten is recorded at frequency rank #34,970, classified as anadj, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈleːktn̩]. verletzen is at rank #6,739, tagged as averb, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈlɛt͡sn̩].
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 41709, this pair ranks #1,471,411 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.
Orthographic DNA of verlegten vs verletzen
Shared letters: elnrtv. Private to "verlegten": g. Private to "verletzen": z.
"verlegten" · 9 letters · shape CVCCVCCVC · "verletzen" · 9 letters · shape CVCCVCCVC
Known mistypes of this pair
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "verlegten" and "verletzen" be used interchangeably?
Frequency check: "verlegten" vs "verletzen" - which ranks higher?
After this comparison
Visual near-miss handled. Browse the word pages or a neighbour when the next look-alike shows up.
- Full dictionary entry for "verlegten" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
- Full dictionary entry for "verletzen" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
- This pair ranks #1,471,411 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
- "verlegten" and "verletzen" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "verlegten vs vorlegte". Nearby pair
- Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes
Confusion rank #1,471,411 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.