Which to use
“Verlags” is a noun and “versagt” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #16,865
- “Verlags” frequency rank
- #5,896
- “versagt” frequency rank
- 22761
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Verlags | versagt |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Genitiv Singular des Substantivs Verlag | Partizip Perfekt des Verbs versagen |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set Verlags and versagt apart are highlighted. They share 5 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
Verlags and versagt form a confusable pair in the German index, two distinct headwords that are easily confused because they look alike, sound alike, or both. They share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions - close enough that the eye skips over the difference, far enough that meaning fully diverges. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 22761, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
Verlags is recorded at frequency rank #16,865, classified as anoun, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈlaːks]. versagt is at rank #5,896, tagged as averb, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈzaːkt].
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 22761, this pair ranks #1,870,104 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "Verlags" and "versagt" be used interchangeably?
Remembering Verlags vs versagt
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Check the role first: if you need a noun, it's “Verlags”; for a verb, it's “versagt”.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “Verlags” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable