schädigenvsSchädigungConfusable pair

Quick tell: schädigen is a verb, Schädigung is a noun, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“schädigen” is a verb and “Schädigung” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#20,736
“schädigen” frequency rank
#24,119
“Schädigung” frequency rank
44855
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature schädigen Schädigung
Definition jemandem oder etwas einen Schaden zufügen schädigendes Ereignis, bei dem eine materielle oder ideelle Verschlechterung eines Rechtsgutes entsteht

Where the eye mixes schädigen and Schädigung

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 8 letters in sequence. schädigen runs 9 letters (CCCVCVCVC) against Schädigung's 10 (CCCVCVCVCC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

9 ch
schädigen
10 ch
Schädigung

Visual trap between schädigen and Schädigung

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: schädigen is [ˈʃɛːdɪɡn̩] while Schädigung is [ˈʃɛːdɪɡʊŋ]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (verb vs noun), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 44855, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

schädigen is recorded at frequency rank #20,736, classified as averb, pronounced [ˈʃɛːdɪɡn̩]. Schädigung is at rank #24,119, tagged as anoun, pronounced [ˈʃɛːdɪɡʊŋ].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 44855, this pair ranks #1,372,503 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of schädigen vs Schädigung

Shared letters: cdghinsä. Private to "schädigen": e. Private to "Schädigung": u.

"schädigen" · 9 letters · shape CCCVCVCVC  ·  "Schädigung" · 10 letters · shape CCCVCVCVCC

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "schädigen" for "Schädigung" ever safe?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "schädigen" is a verb and "Schädigung" a noun, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Frequency check: "schädigen" vs "Schädigung" - which ranks higher?
"schädigen" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #20,736 in our German list, against #24,119 for "Schädigung". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Eye-level mix-up between "schädigen" and "Schädigung" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.

  • Full dictionary entry for "schädigen" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "Schädigung" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,372,503 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "schädigen" and "Schädigung" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "Schädigung vs Schädigungen". Nearby pair

Confusion rank #1,372,503 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list