Which to use
“poor” is an adjective and “pour” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #31,733
- “poor” frequency rank
- #7,799
- “pour” frequency rank
- 39532
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | poor | pour |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | wenig Geld haben | eingießen, einschenken |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set poor and pour apart are highlighted. They share 3 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
poor and pour form a confusable pair in the German index, two distinct headwords that are easily confused because they look alike, sound alike, or both. They differ by a single letter - o in “poor” becomes u in “pour” - close enough that the eye skips over the difference, far enough that meaning fully diverges. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 39532, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
poor is recorded at frequency rank #31,733, classified as anadj, pronounced […]. pour is at rank #7,799, tagged as averb, pronounced [pɔː].
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 39532, this pair ranks #1,534,163 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "poor" and "pour" be used interchangeably?
Remembering poor vs pour
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Check the role first: if you need an adjective, it's “poor”; for a verb, it's “pour”.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “poor” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable