harmlosvsHarmsWhat's the difference?

Quick tell: harmlos is a adjective, Harms is a noun, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“harmlos” is an adjective and “Harms” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#8,387
“harmlos” frequency rank
#31,599
“Harms” frequency rank
39986
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature harmlos Harms
Definition völlig unschädlich und ungefährlich, frei von Aggressionen Genitiv Singular des Substantivs Harm

Where the spellings diverge

Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set harmlos and Harms apart are highlighted. They share 5 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.

7 ch
harmlos
5 ch
Harms

Spelling & Dictionary Insight

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: harmlos is [ˈhaʁmloːs] while Harms is [haʁms]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 2 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (adjective vs noun), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 39986, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

harmlos is recorded at frequency rank #8,387, classified as anadj, pronounced [ˈhaʁmloːs]. Harms is at rank #31,599, tagged as anoun, pronounced [haʁms].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 39986, this pair ranks #1,521,273 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of harmlos vs Harms

Shared letters: ahmrs. Private to "harmlos": lo. Private to "Harms": -.

"harmlos" · 7 letters · shape CVCCCVC  ·  "Harms" · 5 letters · shape CVCCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • harmlosahrmlos · hamrlos · harlmos · harmllos · harmloss · harmlso · harmmlos · harmols
  • Harmsahrms · hamrs · harmms · harmss · harrms · harsm · hharms · hrams

Frequency comparison

harmlos#8,387
Harms#31,599

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "harmlos" and "Harms" be used interchangeably?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "harmlos" is an adjective and "Harms" a noun, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "harmlos" or "Harms"?
"harmlos" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #8,387 in our German list, against #31,599 for "Harms". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Remembering harmlos vs Harms

The fastest way to pick the right one every time.

  • Check the role first: if you need an adjective, it's “harmlos”; for a noun, it's “Harms”.
  • See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “harmlos” entry
  • Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list