implicabavsimplicarConfusable pair

Which to use

“implicaba” and “implicar” are a confusable Spanish pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#19,445
“implicaba” frequency rank
#19,446
“implicar” frequency rank
38891
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature implicaba implicar
Definition Primera persona del singular (yo) del pretérito imperfecto de indicativo de implicar. Comprometer o envolver a alguien en algún asunto o circunstancia.

Where the eye mixes implicaba and implicar

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 7 letters in sequence.

9 ch
implicaba
8 ch
implicar

Visual trap between implicaba and implicar

A purely visual mix-up. implicaba ([ĩmpliˈkaβ̞a]) and implicar ([ĩmpliˈkaɾ]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 38891, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

implicaba is recorded at frequency rank #19,445, classified as averb, pronounced [ĩmpliˈkaβ̞a]. implicar is at rank #19,446, tagged as averb, pronounced [ĩmpliˈkaɾ].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 38891, this pair ranks #167,536 of 323,831 scored Spanish confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of implicaba vs implicar

Shared letters: acilmp. Private to "implicaba": b. Private to "implicar": r.

"implicaba" · 9 letters · shape VCCCVCVCV  ·  "implicar" · 8 letters · shape VCCCVCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • implicabaimlpicaba · immplicaba · impilcaba · implciaba · impliacba · implicaab · implicabba · implicava
  • implicarimlpicar · immplicar · impilcar · implciar · impliacr · implicarr · impliccar · implicra

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "implicaba" for "implicar" ever safe?
No. They are said differently ([ĩmpliˈkaβ̞a] versus [ĩmpliˈkaɾ]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Which is more common, "implicaba" or "implicar"?
"implicaba" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #19,445 in our Spanish list, against #19,446 for "implicar". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Visual near-miss handled. Browse the word pages or a neighbour when the next look-alike shows up.

  • Full dictionary entry for "implicaba" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "implicar" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #167,536 of 323,831 scored Spanish confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "implicaba" and "implicar" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "implicar vs implicó". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #167,536 of 323,831 scored Spanish pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list