implicabavsimplicanWhich spelling fits?

Which to use

“implicaba” and “implican” are a confusable Spanish pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#19,445
“implicaba” frequency rank
#13,490
“implican” frequency rank
32935
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature implicaba implican
Definition Primera persona del singular (yo) del pretérito imperfecto de indicativo de implicar. Tercera persona del plural (ellos, ellas; ustedes, 2.ª persona) del presente de indicativo de implicar.

Where the eye mixes implicaba and implican

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 7 letters in sequence.

9 ch
implicaba
8 ch
implican

Look-alike desk: implicaba vs implican

A purely visual mix-up. implicaba ([ĩmpliˈkaβ̞a]) and implican ([ĩmˈplikãn]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 32935, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

implicaba is recorded at frequency rank #19,445, classified as averb, pronounced [ĩmpliˈkaβ̞a]. implican is at rank #13,490, tagged as averb, pronounced [ĩmˈplikãn].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 32935, this pair ranks #199,407 of 323,831 scored Spanish confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of implicaba vs implican

Shared letters: acilmp. Private to "implicaba": b. Private to "implican": n.

"implicaba" · 9 letters · shape VCCCVCVCV  ·  "implican" · 8 letters · shape VCCCVCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • implicabaimlpicaba · immplicaba · impilcaba · implciaba · impliacba · implicaab · implicabba · implicava
  • implicanimlpican · immplican · impilcan · implcian · impliacn · implicann · impliccan · implicna

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "implicaba" and "implican" be used interchangeably?
No. They are said differently ([ĩmpliˈkaβ̞a] versus [ĩmˈplikãn]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Which is more common, "implicaba" or "implican"?
"implican" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #13,490 in our Spanish list, against #19,445 for "implicaba". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

What to do next

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "implicaba" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "implican" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #199,407 of 323,831 scored Spanish confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "implicaba" and "implican" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "implican vs implicando". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #199,407 of 323,831 scored Spanish pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list