Which to use
“were” is a verb and “wide” is an adjective - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #52
- “were” frequency rank
- #1,177
- “wide” frequency rank
- 1229
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | were | wide |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | second-person singular simple past indicative of be | Having a large physical extent from side to side. |
Where the eye mixes were and wide
Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: were is /wə(ɹ)/ while wide is /waɪd/. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions, and the parts of speech differ too (verb vs adjective), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 1229, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
were is recorded at frequency rank #52, classified as averb, pronounced /wə(ɹ)/. wide is at rank #1,177, tagged as anadj, pronounced /waɪd/.
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 1229, this pair ranks #527,836 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.
Orthographic DNA of were vs wide
Shared letters: ew. Private to "were": r. Private to "wide": di.
"were" · 4 letters · shape CVCV · "wide" · 4 letters · shape CVCV