reducedvsreducesConfusable pair

Which to use

“reduced” and “reduces” are a confusable English pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#2,309
“reduced” frequency rank
#7,381
“reduces” frequency rank
9690
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature reduced reduces
Definition simple past and past participle of reduce third-person singular simple present indicative of reduce

Where the eye mixes reduced and reduces

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 6 letters in sequence. reduced and reduces follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (CVCVCVC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.

7 ch
reduced
7 ch
reduces

Look-alike desk: reduced vs reduces

A purely visual mix-up. reduced (/ɹɪˈdjuːst/) and reduces (/ɹɪˈdjuː.sɪz/) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by a single letter - d in “reduced” becomes s in “reduces”. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 9690, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

reduced is recorded at frequency rank #2,309, classified as averb, pronounced /ɹɪˈdjuːst/. reduces is at rank #7,381, tagged as averb, pronounced /ɹɪˈdjuː.sɪz/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 9690, this pair ranks #496,121 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of reduced vs reduces

Shared letters: cderu. Private to "reduced": -. Private to "reduces": s.

"reduced" · 7 letters · shape CVCVCVC  ·  "reduces" · 7 letters · shape CVCVCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • reduced ← erduced · rdeuced · redcued · redduced · reducced · reducde · reducedd · reduecd
  • reduces ← erduces · rdeuces · redcues · redduces · reducces · reducess · reducse · reduecs

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "reduced" and "reduces" be used interchangeably?
No. They are said differently (/ɹɪˈdjuːst/ versus /ɹɪˈdjuː.sɪz/) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Frequency check: "reduced" vs "reduces" - which ranks higher?
"reduced" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #2,309 in our English list, against #7,381 for "reduces". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

What to do next

Eye-level mix-up between "reduced" and "reduces" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.

  • Full dictionary entry for "reduced" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "reduces" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #496,121 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "reduced" and "reduces" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "redacted vs reduced". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #496,121 of 530,003 scored English pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list