Diskussionsbeitrag
[dɪskʊˈsi̯oːnsbaɪ̯ˌtʁaːk]
The verdict
“Diskussionsbeitrag” is uncommon German (frequency #91,480 among 2,764 “D” headwords), classed as a noun. The kind of spelling people second-guess.
- #91,480
- frequency rank, German
- 2,764
- “D” headwords
According to Wiktionary data (CC BY-SA, analyzed September 3, 2026) - Wortbeitrag bei einer Diskussion
Corpus desk
Index DE-diskussionsbeitrag · Diskussionsbeitrag · German
Diskussionsbeitrag · rank #91,480 · 0 variants · 0 confusables
- FREQ-RARE #91,480
- LEN-MEGA 18 letters
- VOW-7 7 vowels
- CONFUS-0 No pairs
- VAR-0 0 variants
- BOOK-MID 2,764
- PHOTO-FINISH Diskussionsbe…
Nearest frequency peer: Diskussionsbedarf (-1 rank slots)
Desk codes from Wiktionary headword shape, FrequencyWords rank tier, confusable-pair count, generated misspelling depth, letter-cohort book size, and photo-finish peer. Not a difficulty grade.
Langschwanz-Ränge nahe „Diskussionsbeitrag“
Dünnes Band: Balken invertieren den Rang, seltenere Formen wirken kürzer
- dimensionale
dimensionale
8,524 corpus weight
- Dingsbums
Dingsbums
8,523 corpus weight
- Diskussions…
Diskussionsbedarf
8,522 corpus weight
- Diskussions…
Diskussionsbeitrag
8,521 corpus weight
- Dissident
Dissident
8,520 corpus weight
- Dividendenr…
Dividendenrendite
8,519 corpus weight
What this shows Langschwanz-Sicht: wo „Diskussionsbeitrag“ gegen ähnlich seltene deutsche Ränge sitzt.
| Property | Value |
|---|---|
| Headword | Diskussionsbeitrag |
| Language | German |
| Part of speech | Noun |
| IPA | [dɪskʊˈsi̯oːnsbaɪ̯ˌtʁaːk] |
| Letters | 18 |
| Frequency rank | #91,480 |
| Misspellings tracked | 0 |
| Confusable pairs | 0 |
| Source | Wiktionary (kaikki.org) |
Langschwanz-Rang von „Diskussionsbeitrag“ im Deutschen
Rare enough to double-check
Diskussionsbeitrag is uncommon German at frequency #91,480 among 2,764 “D” headwords, classed as anoun, transcribed [dɪskʊˈsi̯oːnsbaɪ̯ˌtʁaːk]. Rarity is why readers land here mid-draft. Gloss: "Wortbeitrag bei einer Diskussion".
Our edit-distance generator produced no likely misspellings for Diskussionsbeitrag, and the word's spelling is regular enough that our generator found nothing worth flagging. This entry stands alone in our confusable dataset, since nothing in our dataset looks or sounds close enough to cause mix-ups.
No borrowing history is documented for this entry, leaving phoneme-to-grapheme mapping as the best guide to its spelling rather than a borrowing history. The correct German form is Diskussionsbeitrag, spelled D-I-S-K-U-S-S-I-O-N-S-B-E-I-T-R-A-G.
Definition
- 1Wortbeitrag bei einer Diskussion
Recorded use
Wiktionary exampleThese source excerpts show how Diskussionsbeitrag appears in context. They illustrate usage; the definition above remains the entry’s reference meaning.
„Niemand wollte einen Diskussionsbeitrag halten. Jeder redete sich heraus.“
Definitions, pronunciation, and etymology for this entry are drawn from Wiktionary via the kaikki.org structured extract (CC BY-SA); frequency ordering uses the FrequencyWords open word-frequency list (2018 German corpus, MIT). See the methodology for how each field is sourced and updated.
Frequently Asked Questions
How do you spell "Diskussionsbeitrag"?
What does "Diskussionsbeitrag" mean?
How do you pronounce "Diskussionsbeitrag"?
What language does "Diskussionsbeitrag" come from?
Is PlainSpell free to use?
Similar German words by spelling shape
Same letter count and similar misspelling depth for "Diskussionsbeitrag", not the corpus desk frequency band.
Same letter count
Frequency-ranked German headwords with 18 letters (nearest by frequency rank).