verhaftenvsverhängenConfusable pair

Which to use

“verhaften” and “verhängen” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#19,752
“verhaften” frequency rank
#27,545
“verhängen” frequency rank
47297
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature verhaften verhängen
Definition jemanden in Haft, in Gewahrsam nehmen etwas mit einem Tuch oder dergleichen zuhängen, verbergen

Where the eye mixes verhaften and verhängen

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 6 letters in sequence. verhaften and verhängen follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (CVCCVCCVC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.

9 ch
verhaften
9 ch
verhängen

Why the eye confuses verhaften with verhängen

A purely visual mix-up. verhaften ([fɛɐ̯ˈhaftn̩]) and verhängen ([fɛɐ̯ˈhɛŋən]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they share most of their letters but differ in 3 positions. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 47297, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

verhaften is recorded at frequency rank #19,752, classified as averb, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈhaftn̩]. verhängen is at rank #27,545, tagged as averb, pronounced [fɛɐ̯ˈhɛŋən].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 47297, this pair ranks #1,289,310 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of verhaften vs verhängen

Shared letters: ehnrv. Private to "verhaften": aft. Private to "verhängen": gä.

"verhaften" · 9 letters · shape CVCCVCCVC  ·  "verhängen" · 9 letters · shape CVCCVCCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • verhaften ← evrhaften · vehraften · verahften · verhafetn · verhafften · verhaftenn · verhaftne · verhaftten

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "verhaften" and "verhängen" be used interchangeably?
No. They are said differently ([fɛɐ̯ˈhaftn̩] versus [fɛɐ̯ˈhɛŋən]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Which is more common, "verhaften" or "verhängen"?
"verhaften" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #19,752 in our German list, against #27,545 for "verhängen". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "verhaften" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "verhängen" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,289,310 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "verhaften" and "verhängen" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "verhängen vs verjagen". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,289,310 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list