Which to use
“loos” and “Loses” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.
- #29,226
- “loos” frequency rank
- #49,058
- “Loses” frequency rank
- 78284
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | loos | Loses |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Plural des Substantivs loo | Genitiv Singular des Substantivs Los |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set loos and Loses apart are highlighted. They share 3 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
loos and Loses are indexed as a confusable German pair. We have no recorded pronunciation or part of speech for both members, so the spelling overlap is what we can show you: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 78284, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
loos is recorded at frequency rank #29,226, classified as anoun, pronounced […]. Loses is at rank #49,058, tagged as anoun, pronounced [ˈloːzəs].
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 78284, this pair ranks #241,751 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - among the most confusable pairs.
Orthographic DNA of loos vs Loses
Shared letters: los. Private to "loos": -. Private to "Loses": e.
"loos" · 4 letters · shape CVVC · "Loses" · 5 letters · shape CVCVC
Known mistypes of this pair
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "loos" and "Loses" be used interchangeably?
Which is more common, "loos" or "Loses"?
Remembering loos vs Loses
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Read both glosses above and match the meaning you intend, only context separates this pair.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “loos” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable