Which to use
“Loks” and “Loses” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.
- #41,325
- “Loks” frequency rank
- #49,058
- “Loses” frequency rank
- 90383
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Loks | Loses |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Nominativ Plural des Substantivs Lok | Genitiv Singular des Substantivs Los |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set Loks and Loses apart are highlighted. They share 3 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
A purely visual mix-up. Loks ([lɔks]) and Loses ([ˈloːzəs]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 90383, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
Loks is recorded at frequency rank #41,325, classified as anoun, pronounced [lɔks]. Loses is at rank #49,058, tagged as anoun, pronounced [ˈloːzəs].
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 90383, this pair ranks #47,578 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - among the most confusable pairs.
Orthographic DNA of Loks vs Loses
Shared letters: los. Private to "Loks": k. Private to "Loses": e.
"Loks" · 4 letters · shape CVCC · "Loses" · 5 letters · shape CVCVC
Known mistypes of this pair
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "Loks" and "Loses" be used interchangeably?
Which is more common, "Loks" or "Loses"?
Remembering Loks vs Loses
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Read both glosses above and match the meaning you intend, only context separates this pair.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “Loks” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable