LoksvslowWhat's the difference?

Quick tell: Loks is a noun, low is an adjective, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“Loks” is a noun and “low” is an adjective - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#41,325
“Loks” frequency rank
#7,361
“low” frequency rank
48686
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature Loks low
Definition Nominativ Plural des Substantivs Lok etwas hat eine niedrige Höhe

Where the eye mixes Loks and low

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence.

4 ch
Loks
3 ch
low

Why the eye confuses Loks with low

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: Loks is [lɔks] while low is [ləʊ]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (noun vs adjective), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 48686, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

Loks is recorded at frequency rank #41,325, classified as anoun, pronounced [lɔks]. low is at rank #7,361, tagged as anadj, pronounced [ləʊ].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 48686, this pair ranks #1,239,389 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of Loks vs low

Shared letters: lo. Private to "Loks": ks. Private to "low": w.

"Loks" · 4 letters · shape CVCC  ·  "low" · 3 letters · shape CVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • Lokslloks · lokks · lokss · losk · olks

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "Loks" for "low" ever safe?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "Loks" is a noun and "low" an adjective, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
In ordinary German text, does "Loks" or "low" show up more?
"low" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #7,361 in our German list, against #41,325 for "Loks". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "Loks" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "low" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,239,389 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "Loks" and "low" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "Loks vs Loses". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,239,389 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list