fundvsfürsWhich spelling fits?

Quick tell: fund is a noun, fürs is an abbrev, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“fund” is a noun and “fürs” is an abbrev - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#8,370
“fund” frequency rank
#1,292
“fürs” frequency rank
9662
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature fund fürs
Definition Fonds, Anlagefonds, Kapital für das

Where the eye mixes fund and fürs

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 1 letter in sequence. fund and fürs follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (CVCC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.

4 ch
fund
4 ch
fürs

Visual trap between fund and fürs

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: fund is [fʌnd] while fürs is [fyːɐ̯s]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they share most of their letters but differ in 3 positions, and the parts of speech differ too (noun vs abbrev), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 9662, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

fund is recorded at frequency rank #8,370, classified as anoun, pronounced [fʌnd]. fürs is at rank #1,292, tagged as anabbrev, pronounced [fyːɐ̯s].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 9662, this pair ranks #1,978,886 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of fund vs fürs

Shared letters: f. Private to "fund": dnu. Private to "fürs": rsü.

"fund" · 4 letters · shape CVCC  ·  "fürs" · 4 letters · shape CVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • fundffund · fnud · fudn · fundd · funnd · ufnd

Frequently Asked Questions

Do "fund" and "fürs" mean the same thing in a sentence?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "fund" is a noun and "fürs" an abbrev, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
In ordinary German text, does "fund" or "fürs" show up more?
"fürs" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #1,292 in our German list, against #8,370 for "fund". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

What to do next

Eye-level mix-up between "fund" and "fürs" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.

  • Full dictionary entry for "fund" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "fürs" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,978,886 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "fund" and "fürs" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "fund vs funzt". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,978,886 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list