FoulsvsfürsWhat's the difference?

Quick tell: Fouls is a noun, fürs is an abbrev, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“Fouls” is a noun and “fürs” is an abbrev - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#48,153
“Fouls” frequency rank
#1,292
“fürs” frequency rank
49445
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature Fouls fürs
Definition Nominativ Plural des Substantivs Foul für das

Where the spellings diverge

Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set Fouls and fürs apart are highlighted. They share 2 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.

5 ch
Fouls
4 ch
fürs

Spelling & Dictionary Insight

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: Fouls is [faʊ̯ls] while fürs is [fyːɐ̯s]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (noun vs abbrev), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 49445, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

Fouls is recorded at frequency rank #48,153, classified as anoun, pronounced [faʊ̯ls]. fürs is at rank #1,292, tagged as anabbrev, pronounced [fyːɐ̯s].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 49445, this pair ranks #1,211,265 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of Fouls vs fürs

Shared letters: fs. Private to "Fouls": lou. Private to "fürs": .

"Fouls" · 5 letters · shape CVVCC  ·  "fürs" · 4 letters · shape CVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • Foulsffouls · folus · foulls · foulss · fousl · fuols · ofuls

Frequency comparison

Fouls#48,153
fürs#1,292

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "Fouls" and "fürs" be used interchangeably?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "Fouls" is a noun and "fürs" an abbrev, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "Fouls" or "fürs"?
"fürs" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #1,292 in our German list, against #48,153 for "Fouls". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

Remembering Fouls vs fürs

The fastest way to pick the right one every time.

  • Check the role first: if you need a noun, it's “Fouls”; for an abbrev, it's “fürs”.
  • See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “Fouls” entry
  • Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list