erhieltvserziehtWhat's the difference?

Which to use

“erhielt” and “erzieht” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#1,766
“erhielt” frequency rank
#39,327
“erzieht” frequency rank
41093
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature erhielt erzieht
Definition 1. Person Singular Indikativ Präteritum Aktiv des Verbs erhalten 2. Person Plural Imperativ Präsens Aktiv des Verbs erziehen

Where the eye mixes erhielt and erzieht

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 5 letters in sequence. erhielt and erzieht follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (VCCVVCC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.

7 ch
erhielt
7 ch
erzieht

Visual trap between erhielt and erzieht

A purely visual mix-up. erhielt ([ɛɐ̯ˈhiːlt]) and erzieht ([ɛɐ̯ˈt͡siːt]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 41093, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

erhielt is recorded at frequency rank #1,766, classified as averb, pronounced [ɛɐ̯ˈhiːlt]. erzieht is at rank #39,327, tagged as averb, pronounced [ɛɐ̯ˈt͡siːt].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 41093, this pair ranks #1,489,572 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of erhielt vs erzieht

Shared letters: ehirt. Private to "erhielt": l. Private to "erzieht": z.

"erhielt" · 7 letters · shape VCCVVCC  ·  "erzieht" · 7 letters · shape VCCVVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • erhieltehrielt · erheilt · erhhielt · erhiellt · erhieltt · erhietl · erhilet · erihelt
  • erziehterizeht · errzieht · erzeiht · erziehht · erziehtt · erzieth · erzihet · erzzieht

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "erhielt" for "erzieht" ever safe?
No. They are said differently ([ɛɐ̯ˈhiːlt] versus [ɛɐ̯ˈt͡siːt]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Which is more common, "erhielt" or "erzieht"?
"erhielt" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #1,766 in our German list, against #39,327 for "erzieht". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

What to do next

Eye-level mix-up between "erhielt" and "erzieht" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.

  • Full dictionary entry for "erhielt" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "erzieht" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,489,572 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "erhielt" and "erzieht" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "erliegt vs erzieht". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,489,572 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list