erhieltvserspieltTell them apart

Which to use

“erhielt” and “erspielt” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#1,766
“erhielt” frequency rank
#47,363
“erspielt” frequency rank
49129
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature erhielt erspielt
Definition 1. Person Singular Indikativ Präteritum Aktiv des Verbs erhalten Partizip Perfekt des Verbs erspielen

Where the eye mixes erhielt and erspielt

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 6 letters in sequence. erhielt runs 7 letters (VCCVVCC) against erspielt's 8 (VCCCVVCC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

7 ch
erhielt
8 ch
erspielt

Visual trap between erhielt and erspielt

A purely visual mix-up. erhielt ([ɛɐ̯ˈhiːlt]) and erspielt ([ɛɐ̯ˈʃpiːlt]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 49129, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

erhielt is recorded at frequency rank #1,766, classified as averb, pronounced [ɛɐ̯ˈhiːlt]. erspielt is at rank #47,363, tagged as averb, pronounced [ɛɐ̯ˈʃpiːlt].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 49129, this pair ranks #1,223,072 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of erhielt vs erspielt

Shared letters: eilrt. Private to "erhielt": h. Private to "erspielt": ps.

"erhielt" · 7 letters · shape VCCVVCC  ·  "erspielt" · 8 letters · shape VCCCVVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • erhieltehrielt · erheilt · erhhielt · erhiellt · erhieltt · erhietl · erhilet · erihelt
  • erspielterpsielt · errspielt · ersipelt · erspeilt · erspiellt · erspieltt · erspietl · erspilet

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "erhielt" for "erspielt" ever safe?
No. They are said differently ([ɛɐ̯ˈhiːlt] versus [ɛɐ̯ˈʃpiːlt]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Which is more common, "erhielt" or "erspielt"?
"erhielt" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #1,766 in our German list, against #47,363 for "erspielt". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

What to do next

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "erhielt" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "erspielt" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,223,072 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "erhielt" and "erspielt" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "erspielt vs erzielt". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,223,072 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list