erfassenvserfasstWhich spelling fits?

Which to use

“erfassen” and “erfasst” are a confusable German pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#7,311
“erfassen” frequency rank
#3,370
“erfasst” frequency rank
10681
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature erfassen erfasst
Definition ergreifen, mitreißen; meistens durch ein vorbeikommendes Fahrzeug Partizip Perfekt des Verbs erfassen

Where the eye mixes erfassen and erfasst

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 6 letters in sequence. erfassen runs 8 letters (VCCVCCVC) against erfasst's 7 (VCCVCCC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

8 ch
erfassen
7 ch
erfasst

Look-alike desk: erfassen vs erfasst

A purely visual mix-up. erfassen ([ɛɐ̯ˈfasn̩]) and erfasst ([ɛɐ̯ˈfast]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 10681, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

erfassen is recorded at frequency rank #7,311, classified as averb, pronounced [ɛɐ̯ˈfasn̩]. erfasst is at rank #3,370, tagged as averb, pronounced [ɛɐ̯ˈfast].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 10681, this pair ranks #1,973,884 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of erfassen vs erfasst

Shared letters: aefrs. Private to "erfassen": n. Private to "erfasst": t.

"erfassen" · 8 letters · shape VCCVCCVC  ·  "erfasst" · 7 letters · shape VCCVCCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • erfassen ← efrassen · erafssen · erfasen · erfasesn · erfassenn · erfassne · erfaßen · erffassen
  • erfasst ← efrasst · erafsst · erfasstt · erfast · erfasts · erfaßt · erffasst · erfsast

Frequently Asked Questions

Do "erfassen" and "erfasst" mean the same thing in a sentence?
No. They are said differently ([ɛɐ̯ˈfasn̩] versus [ɛɐ̯ˈfast]) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
In ordinary German text, does "erfassen" or "erfasst" show up more?
"erfasst" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #3,370 in our German list, against #7,311 for "erfassen". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Visual near-miss handled. Browse the word pages or a neighbour when the next look-alike shows up.

  • Full dictionary entry for "erfassen" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "erfasst" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,973,884 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "erfassen" and "erfasst" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "erfasst vs erlässt". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,973,884 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list