reachvsrichWhat's the difference?

Quick tell: reach is a noun, rich is an adjective, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“reach” is a noun and “rich” is an adjective - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#37,998
“reach” frequency rank
#18,863
“rich” frequency rank
56861
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature reach rich
Definition Pourcentage de cible ayant été touchée par une campagne marketing. Riche.

Where the spellings diverge

Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set reach and rich apart are highlighted. They share 3 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.

5 ch
reach
4 ch
rich

Spelling & Dictionary Insight

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: reach is \ʁitʃ\ while rich is \ɹɪt͡ʃ\. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (noun vs adjective), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 56861, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

reach is recorded at frequency rank #37,998, classified as anoun, pronounced \ʁitʃ\. rich is at rank #18,863, tagged as anadj, pronounced \ɹɪt͡ʃ\.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 56861, this pair ranks #118,466 of 440,172 scored French confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of reach vs rich

Shared letters: chr. Private to "reach": ae. Private to "rich": i.

"reach" · 5 letters · shape CVVCC  ·  "rich" · 4 letters · shape CVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • reacherach · raech · reacch · reachh · reahc · recah · rreach
  • richirch · rcih · ricch · richh · rihc · rrich

Frequency comparison

reach#37,998
rich#18,863

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "reach" and "rich" be used interchangeably?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "reach" is a noun and "rich" an adjective, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "reach" or "rich"?
"rich" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #18,863 in our French list, against #37,998 for "reach". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Remembering reach vs rich

The fastest way to pick the right one every time.

  • Check the role first: if you need a noun, it's “reach”; for an adjective, it's “rich”.
  • See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “reach” entry
  • Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list FrequencyWords open word-frequency list