Which to use
“loth” is an adjective and “Lutz” is a name - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #45,714
- “loth” frequency rank
- #36,477
- “Lutz” frequency rank
- 82191
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | loth | Lutz |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Variante orthographique de loath. | Nom de famille allemand. |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set loth and Lutz apart are highlighted. They share 2 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
Our dataset has no pronunciation recorded for both members, so the reliable separator here is grammatical: loth is anadjective and Lutzaname. On the page they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 82191, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
loth is recorded at frequency rank #45,714, classified as anadj. Lutz is at rank #36,477, tagged as aname.
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 82191, this pair ranks #17,209 of 440,172 scored French confusable pairs - among the most confusable pairs.
Orthographic DNA of loth vs Lutz
Shared letters: lt. Private to "loth": ho. Private to "Lutz": uz.
"loth" · 4 letters · shape CVCC · "Lutz" · 4 letters · shape CVCC
Known mistypes of this pair
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "loth" and "Lutz" be used interchangeably?
Which is more common, "loth" or "Lutz"?
Remembering loth vs Lutz
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Check the role first: if you need an adjective, it's “loth”; for a name, it's “Lutz”.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “loth” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable