Which to use
“lost” and “loth” are a confusable French pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.
- #15,430
- “lost” frequency rank
- #45,714
- “loth” frequency rank
- 61144
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | lost | loth |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Ignorant. | Variante orthographique de loath. |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set lost and loth apart are highlighted. They share 3 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
lost and loth form a confusable pair in the French index, two distinct headwords that are easily confused because they look alike, sound alike, or both. They share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions - close enough that the eye skips over the difference, far enough that meaning fully diverges. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 61144, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
lost is recorded at frequency rank #15,430, classified as anadj, pronounced \lɔst\. loth is at rank #45,714, tagged as anadj.
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 61144, this pair ranks #93,849 of 440,172 scored French confusable pairs - among the most confusable pairs.
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "lost" and "loth" be used interchangeably?
Remembering lost vs loth
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Read both glosses above and match the meaning you intend, only context separates this pair.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “lost” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable