Which to use
“lose” is a noun and “loth” is an adjective - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #34,601
- “lose” frequency rank
- #45,714
- “loth” frequency rank
- 80315
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | lose | loth |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Variante de lauze. | Variante orthographique de loath. |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set lose and loth apart are highlighted. They share 2 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
Our dataset has no pronunciation recorded for both members, so the reliable separator here is grammatical: lose is anoun and lothanadjective. On the page they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 80315, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
lose is recorded at frequency rank #34,601, classified as anoun. loth is at rank #45,714, tagged as anadj.
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 80315, this pair ranks #21,257 of 440,172 scored French confusable pairs - among the most confusable pairs.
Orthographic DNA of lose vs loth
Shared letters: lo. Private to "lose": es. Private to "loth": ht.
"lose" · 4 letters · shape CVCV · "loth" · 4 letters · shape CVCC
Known mistypes of this pair
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "lose" and "loth" be used interchangeably?
Which is more common, "lose" or "loth"?
Remembering lose vs loth
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Check the role first: if you need a noun, it's “lose”; for an adjective, it's “loth”.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “lose” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable