lovslostTell them apart

Quick tell: lo is a article, lost is a noun, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“lo” is an article and “lost” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#19
“lo” frequency rank
#18,302
“lost” frequency rank
18321
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature lo lost
Definition Artículo determinado de género neutro que se usa para sustantivar adjetivos o frases. Forma del neutro de el. Cola de animal.

Where the eye mixes lo and lost

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence.

2 ch
lo
4 ch
lost

Look-alike desk: lo vs lost

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: lo is [lo] while lost is /ˈlɔst/. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 2 extra letter(s) - “lo” sits inside “lost”, and the parts of speech differ too (article vs noun), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 18321, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

lo is recorded at frequency rank #19, classified as anarticle, pronounced [lo]. lost is at rank #18,302, tagged as anoun, pronounced /ˈlɔst/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 18321, this pair ranks #268,384 of 323,831 scored Spanish confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of lo vs lost

Shared letters: lo. Private to "lo": -. Private to "lost": st.

"lo" · 2 letters · shape CV  ·  "lost" · 4 letters · shape CVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • lostllost · losst · lostt · lots · lsot · olst

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "lo" for "lost" ever safe?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "lo" is an article and "lost" a noun, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "lo" or "lost"?
"lo" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #19 in our Spanish list, against #18,302 for "lost". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

After this comparison

Eye-level mix-up between "lo" and "lost" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.

  • Full dictionary entry for "lo" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "lost" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #268,384 of 323,831 scored Spanish confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "lo" and "lost" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "lost vs lotto". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #268,384 of 323,831 scored Spanish pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list