Which to use
“incluidos” is a participle and “incluimos” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #3,852
- “incluidos” frequency rank
- #35,557
- “incluimos” frequency rank
- 39409
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | incluidos | incluimos |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Forma del plural de incluido, participio de incluir. | Primera persona del plural (nosotros, nosotras) del presente de indicativo de incluir. |
Where the eye mixes incluidos and incluimos
Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 8 letters in sequence. incluidos and incluimos follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (VCCCVVCVC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.
Why the eye confuses incluidos with incluimos
These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: incluidos is [ĩŋˈklwið̞os] while incluimos is [ĩŋˈklwimos]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by a single letter - d in “incluidos” becomes m in “incluimos”, and the parts of speech differ too (participle vs verb), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 39409, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
incluidos is recorded at frequency rank #3,852, classified as aparticiple, pronounced [ĩŋˈklwið̞os]. incluimos is at rank #35,557, tagged as averb, pronounced [ĩŋˈklwimos].
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 39409, this pair ranks #164,630 of 323,831 scored Spanish confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.
Orthographic DNA of incluidos vs incluimos
Shared letters: cilnosu. Private to "incluidos": d. Private to "incluimos": m.
"incluidos" · 9 letters · shape VCCCVVCVC · "incluimos" · 9 letters · shape VCCCVVCVC
Known mistypes of this pair
Frequently Asked Questions
Is swapping "incluidos" for "incluimos" ever safe?
Frequency check: "incluidos" vs "incluimos" - which ranks higher?
Useful next steps
Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.
- Full dictionary entry for "incluidos" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
- Full dictionary entry for "incluimos" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
- This pair ranks #164,630 of 323,831 scored Spanish confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
- "incluidos" and "incluimos" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "incluidas vs incluimos". Nearby pair
- Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes
Confusion rank #164,630 of 323,831 scored Spanish pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.