Which to use
“codex” and “condes” are a confusable Spanish pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.
- #48,897
- “codex” frequency rank
- #15,054
- “condes” frequency rank
- 63951
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | codex | condes |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Tronco, tallo. | Forma del plural de conde. |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set codex and condes apart are highlighted. They share 4 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
A purely visual mix-up. codex (/ˈko.deks/) and condes ([ˈkõn̪d̪es]) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 63951, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
codex is recorded at frequency rank #48,897, classified as anoun, pronounced /ˈko.deks/. condes is at rank #15,054, tagged as anoun, pronounced [ˈkõn̪d̪es].
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 63951, this pair ranks #47,066 of 323,831 scored Spanish confusable pairs - among the most confusable pairs.
Orthographic DNA of codex vs condes
Shared letters: cdeo. Private to "codex": x. Private to "condes": ns.
"codex" · 5 letters · shape CVCVC · "condes" · 6 letters · shape CVCCVC
Known mistypes of this pair
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "codex" and "condes" be used interchangeably?
Which is more common, "codex" or "condes"?
Remembering codex vs condes
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Read both glosses above and match the meaning you intend, only context separates this pair.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “codex” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable