wonvswookWhat's the difference?

Quick tell: won is a verb, wook is a noun, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“won” is a verb and “wook” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#646
“won” frequency rank
#38,248
“wook” frequency rank
38894
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature won wook
Definition simple past and past participle of win An unwashed, unemployed moocher who enjoys traveling to festivals and crashes at other people's houses.

Letter map: won vs wook

Shared letters muted; letters that set won and wook apart highlighted. Shared run: 2.

3 ch
won
4 ch
wook

Part-of-speech tell for won / wook

Our dataset has no pronunciation recorded for both members, so the reliable separator here is grammatical: won is averb and wookanoun. On the page they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 38894, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

won is recorded at frequency rank #646, classified as averb, pronounced /wʌn/. wook is at rank #38,248, tagged as anoun.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 38894, this pair ranks #281,749 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of won vs wook

Shared letters: ow. Private to "won": n. Private to "wook": k.

"won" · 3 letters · shape CVC  ·  "wook" · 4 letters · shape CVVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • wookowok · woko · wookk · wwook

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "won" and "wook" be used interchangeably?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "won" is a verb and "wook" a noun, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Frequency check: "won" vs "wook" - which ranks higher?
"won" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #646 in our English list, against #38,248 for "wook". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

What to do next

Done with this confusable. These links stay specific to "won" and "wook".

  • Full dictionary entry for "won" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "wook" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #281,749 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "won" and "wook" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "wook vs wove". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #281,749 of 530,003 scored English pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list