Which to use
“wilds” is a noun and “wilt” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #33,088
- “wilds” frequency rank
- #21,980
- “wilt” frequency rank
- 55068
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | wilds | wilt |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | plural of wild | To droop or become limp and flaccid (as a dying leaf or flower). |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set wilds and wilt apart are highlighted. They share 3 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
Our dataset has no pronunciation recorded for both members, so the reliable separator here is grammatical: wilds is anoun and wiltaverb. On the page they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 55068, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
wilds is recorded at frequency rank #33,088, classified as anoun. wilt is at rank #21,980, tagged as averb, pronounced /wɪlt/.
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 55068, this pair ranks #136,389 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.
Orthographic DNA of wilds vs wilt
Shared letters: ilw. Private to "wilds": ds. Private to "wilt": t.
"wilds" · 5 letters · shape CVCCC · "wilt" · 4 letters · shape CVCC
Known mistypes of this pair
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "wilds" and "wilt" be used interchangeably?
Which is more common, "wilds" or "wilt"?
Remembering wilds vs wilt
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Check the role first: if you need a noun, it's “wilds”; for a verb, it's “wilt”.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “wilds” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable