whosvswonWhat's the difference?

Quick tell: whos is a noun, won is a verb, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“whos” is a noun and “won” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#27,029
“whos” frequency rank
#646
“won” frequency rank
27675
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature whos won
Definition plural of who; often used along with whats, whys, hows, etc. simple past and past participle of win

Where the eye mixes whos and won

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence.

4 ch
whos
3 ch
won

Why the eye confuses whos with won

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: whos is /huːz/ while won is /wʌn/. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (noun vs verb), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 27675, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

whos is recorded at frequency rank #27,029, classified as anoun, pronounced /huːz/. won is at rank #646, tagged as averb, pronounced /wʌn/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 27675, this pair ranks #377,044 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of whos vs won

Shared letters: ow. Private to "whos": hs. Private to "won": n.

"whos" · 4 letters · shape CCVC  ·  "won" · 3 letters · shape CVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • whoshwos · whhos · whoss · whso · wohs · wwhos

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "whos" for "won" ever safe?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "whos" is a noun and "won" a verb, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Frequency check: "whos" vs "won" - which ranks higher?
"won" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #646 in our English list, against #27,029 for "whos". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

What to do next

Eye-level mix-up between "whos" and "won" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.

  • Full dictionary entry for "whos" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "won" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #377,044 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "whos" and "won" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "whorl vs whos". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #377,044 of 530,003 scored English pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list