wastedvswastesTell them apart

Quick tell: wasted is a adjective, wastes is a noun, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“wasted” is an adjective and “wastes” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#5,281
“wasted” frequency rank
#18,215
“wastes” frequency rank
23496
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature wasted wastes
Definition Not profitably used. plural of waste

Where the eye mixes wasted and wastes

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 5 letters in sequence. wasted and wastes follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (CVCCVC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.

6 ch
wasted
6 ch
wastes

Why the eye confuses wasted with wastes

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: wasted is /ˈweɪstɪd/ while wastes is /weɪsts/. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by a single letter - d in “wasted” becomes s in “wastes”, and the parts of speech differ too (adjective vs noun), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 23496, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

wasted is recorded at frequency rank #5,281, classified as anadj, pronounced /ˈweɪstɪd/. wastes is at rank #18,215, tagged as anoun, pronounced /weɪsts/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 23496, this pair ranks #408,844 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of wasted vs wastes

Shared letters: aestw. Private to "wasted": d. Private to "wastes": -.

"wasted" · 6 letters · shape CVCCVC  ·  "wastes" · 6 letters · shape CVCCVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • wasted ← awsted · wasetd · wassted · wastde · wastedd · wastted · watsed · wsated
  • wastes ← awstes · wasets · wasstes · wastess · wastse · wasttes · watses · wsates

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "wasted" for "wastes" ever safe?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "wasted" is an adjective and "wastes" a noun, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
In ordinary English text, does "wasted" or "wastes" show up more?
"wasted" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #5,281 in our English list, against #18,215 for "wastes". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Eye-level mix-up between "wasted" and "wastes" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.

  • Full dictionary entry for "wasted" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "wastes" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #408,844 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "wasted" and "wastes" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "wastes vs Watters". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #408,844 of 530,003 scored English pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list