there'revsthereforeWhat's the difference?

Quick tell: there're is a contraction, therefore is an adverb, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“there're” is a contraction and “therefore” is an adverb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#37,251
“there're” frequency rank
#1,440
“therefore” frequency rank
38691
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature there're therefore
Definition Contraction of there are. Consequently, by or in consequence of that or this cause; referring to something previously stated.

Where the eye mixes there're and therefore

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 7 letters in sequence.

8 ch
there're
9 ch
therefore

Visual trap between there're and therefore

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: there're is /ˈðɛəˌɹə(ɹ)/ while therefore is /ˈðɛə.fɔː/. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (contraction vs adverb), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 38691, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

there're is recorded at frequency rank #37,251, classified as acontraction, pronounced /ˈðɛəˌɹə(ɹ)/. therefore is at rank #1,440, tagged as anadv, pronounced /ˈðɛə.fɔː/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 38691, this pair ranks #283,686 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of there're vs therefore

Shared letters: ehrt. Private to "there're": -. Private to "therefore": fo.

"there're" · 7 letters · shape CCVCVCV  ·  "therefore" · 9 letters · shape CCVCVCVCV

Known mistypes of this pair

  • thereforehterefore · tehrefore · theerfore · thereffore · therefoer · thereforre · therefroe · thereofre

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "there're" for "therefore" ever safe?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "there're" is a contraction and "therefore" an adverb, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
In ordinary English text, does "there're" or "therefore" show up more?
"therefore" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #1,440 in our English list, against #37,251 for "there're". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

After this comparison

Visual near-miss handled. Browse the word pages or a neighbour when the next look-alike shows up.

  • Full dictionary entry for "there're" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "therefore" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #283,686 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "there're" and "therefore" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "there'd vs there're". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #283,686 of 530,003 scored English pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list