sitesvssittersWhich spelling fits?

Which to use

“sites” and “sitters” are a confusable English pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#1,878
“sites” frequency rank
#40,449
“sitters” frequency rank
42327
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature sites sitters
Definition plural of site plural of sitter

Where the eye mixes sites and sitters

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 5 letters in sequence. sites runs 5 letters (CVCVC) against sitters's 7 (CVCCVCC) - the length gap alone is often enough to separate them once you know to check it.

5 ch
sites
7 ch
sitters

Look-alike desk: sites vs sitters

A purely visual mix-up. sites (/saɪts/) and sitters (/ˈsɪtɚz/) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 2 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 42327, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

sites is recorded at frequency rank #1,878, classified as anoun, pronounced /saɪts/. sitters is at rank #40,449, tagged as anoun, pronounced /ˈsɪtɚz/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 42327, this pair ranks #250,246 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of sites vs sitters

Shared letters: eist. Private to "sites": -. Private to "sitters": r.

"sites" · 5 letters · shape CVCVC  ·  "sitters" · 7 letters · shape CVCCVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • sites ← istes · siets · sitess · sitse · sittes · ssites · sties
  • sitters ← istters · siters · sitetrs · sitterrs · sitterss · sittesr · sittres · ssitters

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "sites" and "sitters" be used interchangeably?
No. They are said differently (/saɪts/ versus /ˈsɪtɚz/) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Frequency check: "sites" vs "sitters" - which ranks higher?
"sites" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #1,878 in our English list, against #40,449 for "sitters". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

Useful next steps

Pronunciation already separates them, if the page still looks alike, the dictionary links below settle it.

  • Full dictionary entry for "sites" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "sitters" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #250,246 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "sites" and "sitters" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "sitters vs Smithers". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #250,246 of 530,003 scored English pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list