Which to use
“placed” and “poached” are a confusable English pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.
- #1,491
- “placed” frequency rank
- #29,421
- “poached” frequency rank
- 30912
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | placed | poached |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | simple past and past participle of place | simple past and past participle of poach |
Where the eye mixes placed and poached
Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 5 letters in sequence.
Why the eye confuses placed with poached
A purely visual mix-up. placed (/pleɪst/) and poached (/pəʊtʃt/) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they differ by 1 letter(s) in length. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 30912, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
placed is recorded at frequency rank #1,491, classified as averb, pronounced /pleɪst/. poached is at rank #29,421, tagged as averb, pronounced /pəʊtʃt/.
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 30912, this pair ranks #350,570 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.
Orthographic DNA of placed vs poached
Shared letters: acdep. Private to "placed": l. Private to "poached": ho.
"placed" · 6 letters · shape CCVCVC · "poached" · 7 letters · shape CVVCCVC
Known mistypes of this pair
Frequently Asked Questions
Is swapping "placed" for "poached" ever safe?
In ordinary English text, does "placed" or "poached" show up more?
After this comparison
Eye-level mix-up between "placed" and "poached" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.
- Full dictionary entry for "placed" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
- Full dictionary entry for "poached" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
- This pair ranks #350,570 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
- "placed" and "poached" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "poached vs poacher". Nearby pair
- Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes
Confusion rank #350,570 of 530,003 scored English pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.