ouldvsowlsWhat's the difference?

Quick tell: ould is a adjective, owls is a noun, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“ould” is an adjective and “owls” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#48,397
“ould” frequency rank
#16,988
“owls” frequency rank
65385
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature ould owls
Definition Pronunciation spelling of old. plural of owl

Where the spellings diverge

Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set ould and owls apart are highlighted. They share 2 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.

4 ch
ould
4 ch
owls

Spelling & Dictionary Insight

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: ould is /aʊld/ while owls is /aʊlz/. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions, and the parts of speech differ too (adjective vs noun), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 65385, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

ould is recorded at frequency rank #48,397, classified as anadj, pronounced /aʊld/. owls is at rank #16,988, tagged as anoun, pronounced /aʊlz/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 65385, this pair ranks #73,013 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - among the most confusable pairs.

Orthographic DNA of ould vs owls

Shared letters: lo. Private to "ould": du. Private to "owls": sw.

"ould" · 4 letters · shape VVCC  ·  "owls" · 4 letters · shape VCCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • ouldoudl · ouldd · oulld · uold
  • owlsolws · owlls · owlss · owsl · owwls · wols

Frequency comparison

ould#48,397
owls#16,988

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "ould" and "owls" be used interchangeably?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "ould" is an adjective and "owls" a noun, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "ould" or "owls"?
"owls" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #16,988 in our English list, against #48,397 for "ould". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Remembering ould vs owls

The fastest way to pick the right one every time.

  • Check the role first: if you need an adjective, it's “ould”; for a noun, it's “owls”.
  • See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “ould” entry
  • Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list