morevsmowWhat's the difference?

Quick tell: more is a determiner, mow is a verb, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“more” is a determiner and “mow” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#49
“more” frequency rank
#25,486
“mow” frequency rank
25535
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature more mow
Definition comparative degree of many: in greater number. (Used for a discrete quantity.) To cut down grass or crops.

Where the eye mixes more and mow

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence.

4 ch
more
3 ch
mow

Spelling & Dictionary Insight

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: more is /mɔː(ɹ)/ while mow is /məʊ/. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (determiner vs verb), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 25535, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

more is recorded at frequency rank #49, classified as adet, pronounced /mɔː(ɹ)/. mow is at rank #25,486, tagged as averb, pronounced /məʊ/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 25535, this pair ranks #393,553 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of more vs mow

Shared letters: mo. Private to "more": er. Private to "mow": w.

"more" · 4 letters · shape CVCV  ·  "mow" · 3 letters · shape CVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • moremmore · moer · morre · mroe · omre

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "more" and "mow" be used interchangeably?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "more" is a determiner and "mow" a verb, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "more" or "mow"?
"more" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #49 in our English list, against #25,486 for "mow". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list