mansvsmawWhat's the difference?

Quick tell: mans is a verb, maw is a noun, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“mans” is a verb and “maw” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#11,566
“mans” frequency rank
#30,495
“maw” frequency rank
42061
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature mans maw
Definition third-person singular simple present indicative of man The stomach, especially of an animal.

Where the eye mixes mans and maw

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence.

4 ch
mans
3 ch
maw

Spelling & Dictionary Insight

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: mans is /mænz/ while maw is /mɔː/. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (verb vs noun), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 42061, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

mans is recorded at frequency rank #11,566, classified as averb, pronounced /mænz/. maw is at rank #30,495, tagged as anoun, pronounced /mɔː/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 42061, this pair ranks #252,660 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of mans vs maw

Shared letters: am. Private to "mans": ns. Private to "maw": w.

"mans" · 4 letters · shape CVCC  ·  "maw" · 3 letters · shape CVC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • mansamns · manns · manss · masn · mmans · mnas

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "mans" and "maw" be used interchangeably?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "mans" is a verb and "maw" a noun, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "mans" or "maw"?
"mans" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #11,566 in our English list, against #30,495 for "maw". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list