lotsvslutzWhat's the difference?

Which to use

“lots” and “lutz” are a confusable English pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#1,399
“lots” frequency rank
#29,727
“lutz” frequency rank
31126
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature lots lutz
Definition plural of lot A jump in which the skater takes off from the back outside edge of one skate, rotates counterclockwise and lands on the back outside edge of the other skate.

Where the eye mixes lots and lutz

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence.

4 ch
lots
4 ch
lutz

Spelling & Dictionary Insight

A purely visual mix-up. lots (/lɑts/) and lutz (/lʌts/) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 31126, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

lots is recorded at frequency rank #1,399, classified as anoun, pronounced /lɑts/. lutz is at rank #29,727, tagged as anoun, pronounced /lʌts/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 31126, this pair ranks #348,805 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of lots vs lutz

Shared letters: lt. Private to "lots": os. Private to "lutz": uz.

"lots" · 4 letters · shape CVCC  ·  "lutz" · 4 letters · shape CVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • lotsllots · lotss · lotts · ltos · olts
  • lutzllutz · ltuz · luttz · lutzz · luzt · ultz

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "lots" and "lutz" be used interchangeably?
No. They are said differently (/lɑts/ versus /lʌts/) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Which is more common, "lots" or "lutz"?
"lots" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #1,399 in our English list, against #29,727 for "lutz". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list