loathvslostConfusable pair

Quick tell: loath is a adjective, lost is a verb, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“loath” is an adjective and “lost” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#43,241
“loath” frequency rank
#400
“lost” frequency rank
43641
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature loath lost
Definition Averse, disinclined; reluctant, unwilling. Always followed by a verbal phrase. simple past and past participle of lose

Where the eye mixes loath and lost

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 3 letters in sequence.

5 ch
loath
4 ch
lost

Visual trap between loath and lost

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: loath is /ləʊθ/ while lost is /lɒst/. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (adjective vs verb), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 43641, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

loath is recorded at frequency rank #43,241, classified as anadj, pronounced /ləʊθ/. lost is at rank #400, tagged as averb, pronounced /lɒst/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 43641, this pair ranks #238,031 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - roughly mid-pack for confusability.

Orthographic DNA of loath vs lost

Shared letters: lot. Private to "loath": ah. Private to "lost": s.

"loath" · 5 letters · shape CVVCC  ·  "lost" · 4 letters · shape CVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • loathlaoth · lloath · loaht · loathh · loatth · lotah · olath
  • lostllost · losst · lostt · lsot · olst

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "loath" and "lost" be used interchangeably?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "loath" is an adjective and "lost" a verb, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Frequency check: "loath" vs "lost" - which ranks higher?
"lost" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #400 in our English list, against #43,241 for "loath". That is a wide gap, so in ordinary text the rarer spelling is the one worth double-checking.

What to do next

Eye-level mix-up between "loath" and "lost" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.

  • Full dictionary entry for "loath" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "lost" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #238,031 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "loath" and "lost" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "loath vs LSAT". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #238,031 of 530,003 scored English pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list