lessvslostWhat's the difference?

Quick tell: less is a adverb, lost is a verb, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“less” is an adverb and “lost” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#305
“less” frequency rank
#400
“lost” frequency rank
705
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature less lost
Definition comparative degree of little simple past and past participle of lose

Where the eye mixes less and lost

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence.

4 ch
less
4 ch
lost

Spelling & Dictionary Insight

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: less is /lɛs/ while lost is /lɒst/. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions, and the parts of speech differ too (adverb vs verb), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 705, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

less is recorded at frequency rank #305, classified as anadv, pronounced /lɛs/. lost is at rank #400, tagged as averb, pronounced /lɒst/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 705, this pair ranks #528,939 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of less vs lost

Shared letters: ls. Private to "less": e. Private to "lost": ot.

"less" · 4 letters · shape CVCC  ·  "lost" · 4 letters · shape CVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • lesselss · lless · lses
  • lostllost · losst · lostt · lsot · olst

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "less" and "lost" be used interchangeably?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "less" is an adverb and "lost" a verb, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
Which is more common, "less" or "lost"?
"less" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #305 in our English list, against #400 for "lost". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list