lacksvslinksWhich spelling fits?

Which to use

“lacks” and “links” are a confusable English pair: similar on the page, but distinct in meaning, check the gloss before you choose.

#8,444
“lacks” frequency rank
#1,951
“links” frequency rank
10395
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature lacks links
Definition plural of lack plural of link

Where the eye mixes lacks and links

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 3 letters in sequence.

5 ch
lacks
5 ch
links

Why the eye confuses lacks with links

A purely visual mix-up. lacks (/læks/) and links (/lɪŋks/) are said differently, so reading them aloud is the quickest way to catch the wrong one. On the page they stay close: they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 10395, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

lacks is recorded at frequency rank #8,444, classified as anoun, pronounced /læks/. links is at rank #1,951, tagged as anoun, pronounced /lɪŋks/.

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 10395, this pair ranks #492,563 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of lacks vs links

Shared letters: kls. Private to "lacks": ac. Private to "links": in.

"lacks" · 5 letters · shape CVCCC  ·  "links" · 5 letters · shape CVCCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • lacksalcks · laccks · lackks · lackss · lacsk · lakcs · lcaks · llacks
  • linksilnks · likns · linkks · linkss · linnks · linsk · llinks · lniks

Frequently Asked Questions

Can "lacks" and "links" be used interchangeably?
No. They are said differently (/læks/ versus /lɪŋks/) and carry different meanings; reading the sentence aloud is usually enough to catch the wrong one.
Frequency check: "lacks" vs "links" - which ranks higher?
"links" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #1,951 in our English list, against #8,444 for "lacks". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

After this comparison

Visual near-miss handled. Browse the word pages or a neighbour when the next look-alike shows up.

  • Full dictionary entry for "lacks" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "links" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #492,563 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "lacks" and "links" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "lacks vs lances". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #492,563 of 530,003 scored English pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list