Which to use
“integrate” is a verb and “integrator” is a noun - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #10,873
- “integrate” frequency rank
- #48,293
- “integrator” frequency rank
- 59166
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | integrate | integrator |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | To include as a constituent part or functionality. | A person who, or a device which, integrates. |
Where the spellings diverge
Shared letters are muted; the letters that actually set integrate and integrator apart are highlighted. They share 8 letters in sequence, which is exactly why the eye skips the difference.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
integrate and integrator form a confusable pair in the English index, two distinct headwords that are easily confused because they look alike, sound alike, or both. They differ by 1 letter(s) in length - close enough that the eye skips over the difference, far enough that meaning fully diverges. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 59166, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
integrate is recorded at frequency rank #10,873, classified as averb, pronounced /ˈɪn.tɪ.ɡɹeɪt/. integrator is at rank #48,293, tagged as anoun.
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 59166, this pair ranks #107,886 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - among the most confusable pairs.
Frequency comparison
Frequently Asked Questions
Can "integrate" and "integrator" be used interchangeably?
Remembering integrate vs integrator
The fastest way to pick the right one every time.
- Check the role first: if you need a verb, it's “integrate”; for a noun, it's “integrator”.
- See each word in full, definition, IPA, etymology and its other confusables. Full “integrate” entry
- Browse more pairs most likely to be confused. Most confusable