Which to use
“dogs” is a noun and “dug” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #1,754
- “dogs” frequency rank
- #8,784
- “dug” frequency rank
- 10538
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | dogs | dug |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | plural of dog | simple past and past participle of dig (replacing earlier digged) |
Where the eye mixes dogs and dug
Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: dogs is /dɒɡz/ while dug is /dʌɡ/. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (noun vs verb), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 10538, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
dogs is recorded at frequency rank #1,754, classified as anoun, pronounced /dɒɡz/. dug is at rank #8,784, tagged as averb, pronounced /dʌɡ/.
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 10538, this pair ranks #491,801 of 530,003 scored English confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.
Orthographic DNA of dogs vs dug
Shared letters: dg. Private to "dogs": os. Private to "dug": u.
"dogs" · 4 letters · shape CVCC · "dug" · 3 letters · shape CVC
Known mistypes of this pair
- dogs ← ddogs · dgos · doggs · dogss · dosg · odgs