Which to use
“Wild” is a noun and “wund” is an adjective - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.
- #2,629
- “Wild” frequency rank
- #27,577
- “wund” frequency rank
- 30206
- confusion score
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Feature | Wild | wund |
|---|---|---|
| Definition | Gesamtheit freilebender, jagdbarer Tiere | an der Haut aufgeschürft |
Where the eye mixes Wild and wund
Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence.
Spelling & Dictionary Insight
These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: Wild is [vɪlt] while wund is [vʊnt]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions, and the parts of speech differ too (noun vs adjective), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 30206, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.
Wild is recorded at frequency rank #2,629, classified as anoun, pronounced [vɪlt]. wund is at rank #27,577, tagged as anadj, pronounced [vʊnt].
Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.
With a confusion score of 30206, this pair ranks #1,752,356 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.
Orthographic DNA of Wild vs wund
Shared letters: dw. Private to "Wild": il. Private to "wund": nu.
"Wild" · 4 letters · shape CVCC · "wund" · 4 letters · shape CVCC