WegesvswereTell them apart

Quick tell: Weges is a noun, were is a verb, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“Weges” is a noun and “were” is a verb - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#13,737
“Weges” frequency rank
#13,071
“were” frequency rank
26808
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature Weges were
Definition Genitiv Singular des Substantivs Weg 2. Person Singular simple past des Verbs be

Where the eye mixes Weges and were

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 3 letters in sequence.

5 ch
Weges
4 ch
were

Visual trap between Weges and were

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: Weges is [ˈveːɡəs] while were is [wɜː]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they differ by 1 letter(s) in length, and the parts of speech differ too (noun vs verb), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 26808, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

Weges is recorded at frequency rank #13,737, classified as anoun, pronounced [ˈveːɡəs]. were is at rank #13,071, tagged as averb, pronounced [wɜː].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 26808, this pair ranks #1,812,045 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - a relatively easy-to-tell-apart pair.

Orthographic DNA of Weges vs were

Shared letters: ew. Private to "Weges": gs. Private to "were": r.

"Weges" · 5 letters · shape CVCVC  ·  "were" · 4 letters · shape CVCV

Known mistypes of this pair

  • Wegesewges · weegs · wegess · wegges · wegse · wgees · wweges
  • wereewre · weer · werre · wree · wwere

Frequently Asked Questions

Do "Weges" and "were" mean the same thing in a sentence?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "Weges" is a noun and "were" a verb, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
In ordinary German text, does "Weges" or "were" show up more?
"were" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #13,071 in our German list, against #13,737 for "Weges". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

After this comparison

Eye-level mix-up between "Weges" and "were" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.

  • Full dictionary entry for "Weges" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "were" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #1,812,045 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "Weges" and "were" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "Weges vs Weins". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #1,812,045 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list