washvswüstWhich spelling fits?

Quick tell: wash is a verb, wüst is an adjective, so they fill different roles in a sentence.

Which to use

“wash” is a verb and “wüst” is an adjective - they look or sound alike but fill different roles in a sentence.

#44,357
“wash” frequency rank
#28,028
“wüst” frequency rank
72385
confusion score

Side-by-Side Comparison

Feature wash wüst
Definition waschen, säubern weder besiedelt noch landwirtschaftlich genutzt (und zumeist auch nicht nutzbar)

Where the eye mixes wash and wüst

Muted = shared; highlighted = the visual trap. They share 2 letters in sequence. wash and wüst follow the identical consonant-vowel pattern (CVCC). Same shape at a glance is often the real trap, independent of shared letters.

4 ch
wash
4 ch
wüst

Why the eye confuses wash with wüst

These two trip readers on the page rather than in the ear: wash is [wɒʃ] while wüst is [vyːst]. Spoken aloud the problem disappears. In writing it persists, because they share most of their letters but differ in 2 positions, and the parts of speech differ too (verb vs adjective), which is usually the fastest check. Our composite confusion score for this pair is 72385, derived from the frequency rank of both members and their visual similarity.

wash is recorded at frequency rank #44,357, classified as averb, pronounced [wɒʃ]. wüst is at rank #28,028, tagged as anadj, pronounced [vyːst].

Glosses for this pair are partially populated in our dataset, but the full side-by-side definitions above should still guide you to the right choice.

With a confusion score of 72385, this pair ranks #389,861 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs - among the most confusable pairs.

Orthographic DNA of wash vs wüst

Shared letters: sw. Private to "wash": ah. Private to "wüst": tü.

"wash" · 4 letters · shape CVCC  ·  "wüst" · 4 letters · shape CVCC

Known mistypes of this pair

  • wash ← awsh · wahs · washh · wassh · wsah · wwash

Frequently Asked Questions

Is swapping "wash" for "wüst" ever safe?
No - they are not even the same part of speech. "wash" is a verb and "wüst" an adjective, so a sentence built for one is usually ungrammatical with the other.
In ordinary German text, does "wash" or "wüst" show up more?
"wüst" is the more common of the two: it sits at frequency rank #28,028 in our German list, against #44,357 for "wash". The two are close in frequency, so neither is a safe default; check the meaning rather than guessing.

Useful next steps

Eye-level mix-up between "wash" and "wüst" is sorted above. Next: full entries or other pairs that share a letter shape.

  • Full dictionary entry for "wash" with definition, IPA, and generated misspellings. Word entry
  • Full dictionary entry for "wüst" - compare definitions side by side with the headword page. Word entry
  • This pair ranks #389,861 of 2,006,359 scored German confusable pairs in this corpus vintage. Corpus statistics
  • "wash" and "wüst" also get mixed up with nearby pairs, the highest-scored neighbour is "wash vs waste". Nearby pair
  • Recorded mistypes exist for at least one side of this pair, useful when a spell-checker or OCR lands on the wrong form. See mistypes

Confusion rank #389,861 of 2,006,359 scored German pairs, corpus vintage 2026-09-03, not spelling advice.

Source: Wiktionary (via kaikki.org) Structured Wiktionary extract

Source: FrequencyWords open word-frequency list